How Solargis compares

How does Solargis compare to Meteonorm?

We get asked this question quite often. Therefore we present below some facts to help you decide for yourself, which data source is best for your needs.

Meteonorm, developed by Meteotest, is a widely used and accepted solar radiation data source in the solar energy industry. It has been around for 30+ years (the first version was released in 1985), and became the standard meteorological database for solar energy simulations. It is also the default meteorological database of some of the popular PV design software, such as PVsyst or PVSOL.

The first version of Solargis was released in 2010. Accuracy of the database, its reliability and stability across regions have helped Solargis quickly gain the trust of the solar industry.

At first look, both data sources may appear to have similar features, but upon making a detailed comparison, it can be seen that Solargis is clearly superior for the most important features.

Which is more accurate?

The Solargis model has been validated at 220+ locations globally, where high-quality GHI/DNI measurements are available in public domain. A summary of the validation results based on the high-accuracy measurements at these validation points for annual sums of GHI and DNI is given below:

Bias for 80% of validation sites < ±3.1% < ±6.8%
Bias for 90% of validation sites < ±4.6% < ±9.0%
Bias for 98% of validation sites < ±7.1% < ±11.8%

See details in the Solargis data description and validation document.

The Meteonorm database is based on combination of measured and modeled solar radiation data. For European locations, the Heliomont satellite-based solar radiation database is used. As per independent validation, the Heliomont model shows lower performance than Solargis. The CM-SAF database, used for locations in Africa, has been validated at only a couple of locations in Africa. For Americas, Asia, and Australia, no validation document has been published by Meteotest, and therefore accuracy in these regions cannot be objectively evaluated.

Although solar radiation data from 1,300 meteorological stations are incorporated, these stations are geographically unevenly distributed. Majority of them stopped operation in the past, they were equipped with low accuracy sensors and they were poorly maintained. Thus, use of the measured data from majority of these stations may not help improving the accuracy of solar radiation database. On contrary, there is a risk that combining low accuracy measurements with satellite-derived data has a negative impact on the accuracy of final outputs.

Even though the Meteonorm software provides uncertainty estimates (reported at one standard deviation) along with data values, these cannot be blindly trusted as they are not supported by publicly available validation information. The lack of validation document demonstrating accuracy of the final outputs is not surprising - as the hourly values in Meteonorm are synthetically generated (as will be explained in next sections) and a one-to-one comparison with ground measurements is not possible.

Site-specific inputs vs. interpolated data

Solargis solar radiation data is computed for each 250 m x 250 m grid cell. We make use of the best available and high-resolution data inputs that are harmonised in geographical space and time. The Solargis model has also been fine-tuned for all types of landscapes and climate conditions.

In Meteonorm, the key approach for an estimate at a specified location is interpolation of long-term monthly-averaged values from nearby meteorological stations. The modelled data based on satellite imagery is incorporated as support information and used mainly when no meteorological station is available within a distance of 10/20/30 km (in Europe/Africa/Rest of World). This approach has several limitations and can give misleading results in regions where solar resource varies considerably at short distances, e.g. in islands, coastal zones and regions with variable terrain. It should also be noted that different sources of data used as inputs represent different periods of time, and the database is very heterogeneous from the point of time representation.

Real or synthetically generated values?

Solar radiation and air temperature data in the Meteonorm software are primarily stored as monthly averages. Hourly or sub-hourly values are not based on real observations but they are statistically generated from the monthly averages. The synthetic generation of time series is a mathematical process that results in loss of the coherence between solar irradiance and air temperature. Also the frequency distribution of the hourly values in the resulting artificial time series may not represent real conditions of the climate. As performance of solar power systems varies with solar irradiance and air temperature, use of synthetic hourly dataset increases uncertainty of solar energy simulations.

In comparison, Solargis database includes sub-hourly time series of solar radiation based on actual satellite observations and meteorological model outputs.

Number of years of historical archive

In order to account for years with extreme weather conditions, it is recommended to use 10+ years of continuous historical data when estimating long-term solar resource potential. The temporal coverage of solar resource data in the Solargis database varies from 10+ to 23+ years, depending on geographical location.

In case of Meteonorm, adequate temporal coverage, given by satellite-derived solar resource data, is seen only in Africa (1986-2005). For rest of the world, temporal coverage of satellite-derived data is just 5-7 years. Such short period of the satellite database does not comply with the standards for climate assessment.

bar chart meteonorm temporal coverage2

Time step of satellite data

Meteonorm solar resource data are based on processing of hourly or 3-hourly satellite observations. Hourly observations are used only in Europe and Africa. 3-hourly observations can provide misleading cloud coverage information in regions that see fast changing cloud formations, mainly in tropical and temperate climate.

In Solargis, satellite data is processed with frequency of 10,15, or 30 minutes (depending on the satellite platform). This helps us better capture cloud movements, resulting in higher accuracy of sub-hourly solar radiation values, and of the longterm averages derived from such time series.

30 min vs 3 hours

Availability of data for recent time period

Access to time series data for recent time period (last months or year) is important for several reasons:

  • With recent data, it is possible to make one-to-one comparison with ground observations to better understand accuracy of data
  • Accuracy of long-term estimate can be improved. This is only possible when systematic deviations between modeled data and high quality ground observations can be identified
  • Regular updates of recent data can be used for performance monitoring of operations PV power plants

Meteonorm hourly values are synthetic and they do not represent any particular period of time. Therefore, a like-to-like comparison to measurements representing a particular time period is not possible. Meteonorm provides access to recent time series, with regular updates, only for Europe and North Africa.

Solargis data is updated regularly and recent data can be made available globally with daily or monthly updates.

Other differences

In order to be fair to the Meteonorm team, we also want to list some features where they do better than us:

  1. Data for 30+ weather parameters. Although our database does not include as many weather parameters, we do provide harmonised access to all parameters relevant for solar energy assessment
  2. Data export in 36 formats. Although we do not offer such flexibility, our data can be easily imported to the most popular energy simulation software, such as PVsyst, SAM, and others

To be fair to ourselves, there are some more features that Solargis offers but Meteonorm does not:

  1. High resolution multi-year time series data available globally
  2. Validated PV simulation application with extensive functionalities
  3. High resolution interactive solar resource maps
  4. Possibility to download data on device with non-Windows operating system

What about pricing?

Meteonorm can appear to be cheaper from the first viewpoint. However in long-term Solargis offers better value for money and much lower risk for developers, operators and investors into solar power plants.

Hundreds of organisations worldwide, big and small, have chosen Solargis, because they value making decisions on basis of reliable data. In particular, when decisions on development or operation of high-value solar assets are to be made, higher risk associated with the use of high-uncertainty data can be very expensive.

Please note that we make available annual average values for free. If you are looking for more detailed information, and want to reduce risk and save money in the long-term, spending a little more for accurate solar resource and meteorological data from Solargis is the right choice.

The information on Meteonorm published in this article is based on documentation available at time of writing this article (Jan 2017). In case Meteonorm gets an update, and some of the information becomes outdated, please let us know and we will be happy to update this article.

Ready to start with Solargis?