产品
menu item
Prospect
光伏站点太阳能潜力快速评估
menu item
Evaluate
时间序列与TMY数据用于能源建模
menu item
Monitor
实时光伏输出评估
menu item
Forecast
长达14天的太阳能输出预测
menu item
Analyst
简化统一的太阳能数据管理
menu item
集成
自动交付Solargis数据
使用案例
menu item
选址
寻找合适的太阳能项目位置
menu item
能量产出模拟
分析潜在的收益和风险
menu item
优化电厂设计
寻找最佳电厂设计
menu item
实际电厂性能
探索真实产出
menu item
电力输出预测
预测太阳能项目能量产出
menu item
地面数据验证
验证太阳能与气象测量数据质量
太阳能资源与气象评估
详细的太阳能资源验证与评估
Solargis模型应用于场地适应性调整
结合卫星数据与现场测量数据
太阳能与气象测量质量控制
修正地面测量数据中的错误
定制GIS数据服务
用定制的Solargis GIS数据
光伏能量产出评估
能量估算的不确定性和相关数据输入
光伏性能评估
再融资或资产收购的能量估算
光伏变动性与储能优化研究
理解广泛地理区域内的产出变化
区域太阳能潜力研究
太阳能电厂场地识别
我们的专业领域
我们技术的运作方式
研究方法
我们如何将科学转化为技术
API与系统集成
如何通过API集成Solargis数据
产品指南与文档
发布通知
成功案例
博客
电子书
网络研讨会
出版物
活动
免费地图与GIS数据
太阳能性能地图
关于Solargis
合作伙伴
ISO证书
人才招聘

本页未翻译。您正在浏览的是英文版本。

A PV yield simulation serves multiple purposes. It is essential for finding the most appropriate design and components for a project while providing confidence to those investing in building the project.

In the last decades of the 20th century, with the development of solar energy applications, energy simulations have traditionally run their calculations using summarized conditions described by the so-called Typical Meteorological Year datasets (TMY).

Currently, thanks to the relatively recent development of satellite-based modeling and easier access to computing capabilities and software tools, solar industry players can now test their power plant designs and financial plans against more realistic conditions described by multi-year Time Series (TS).

To what extent is it possible to characterize solar irradiance and meteorological conditions with the 8760 values stored in a TMY? Does it mean that popular TMY datasets are no longer useful?

In this article, we provide an overview of these two main datasets commonly used for yield assessments and give recommendations on when to use each of them.

A short description of how TMY is made from TS

The TMY P50 is constructed by selecting the most representative months from the available time series (i.e. the most typical January, February, March, etc.), which are then concatenated into one artificial and representative single year.

In Solargis TMY, the selection of representative months is done through an iterative process based on two main criteria: firstly, achieving minimal differences between the statistical characteristics of the Typical Meteorological Year (TMY) and the actual time series; and secondly, ensuring maximum similarity between the monthly Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDF) of the TMY and the time series, to accurately represent typical values for each selected month.

The difference in relevance of each parameter when selecting the typical months is addressed by assigning weights to the parameters included in the dataset. Besides solar irradiance and temperature, other meteorological parameters are also included in the dataset, but typically these are secondary parameters with less relevance in the analysis and thus do not influence the choice of the representative month.

It is also important to know that different weighting can be used depending on the type of solar energy applications under consideration. For example, a TMY made for building performance simulation could not be the same as one made for thermosolar applications, which in turn could differ from TMYs made for PV simulation software. Therefore, when comparing TMY datasets we always recommend to note how TMY is constructed and what it is made for.

TMY TS Temperature

 Figure 1. Representation of monthly temperature data included respectively in TMY (chart on the left, reference year set to 1900 by convention) and Time Series (chart on the right, data period covering complete years since 1994).

 

Data loss

Essentially, TMY is an attempt to summarize variable conditions into a single year with hourly granularity. This results in lighter files that are easy to handle, but as a consequence, a lot of valuable information is lost.
During the conversion, this data loss occurs in two ways. First, long periods are discarded in the process. Second, the data aggregation of sub-hourly values into hourly hides aspects of resource variability that can be useful to look at.

Besides, since each site may result in a different set of selected months, the TMY algorithm makes it difficult to compare sites. This lack of spatial continuity also makes TMY unsuitable for regional analysis or for adjusting data using nearby ground measurements (site adaptation).

TMY TS Conversion

Figure 2. Graphical representation of the conversion process of TMY from TS

 

When TMY is still useful

Regardless of the data discarded during its construction process, Typical Meteorological Year (TMY) datasets can still be useful for making quick comparisons at the early stages of a solar energy project when site prospection or pre-feasibility analysis is usually required.

Handling light datasets has an effect on data services, making API calls faster. That can be particularly useful for applications where multiple sites need to be checked in a short period of time.

TMY TS Averages

Figure 3. Typical Meteorological Year monthly values are the monthly averages

 

When to definitely use Time Series

Since it represents typical conditions rather than extreme ones, TMY is less suitable after the initial preliminary stages of project development. That is exactly when Time Series can be useful, for instance, when designing systems to withstand the most adverse conditions that might occur at a specific location. When conducting financial studies, Time Series are recommended to anticipate years with lower (or higher) returns.

In general, when a more detailed site characterization is required, Time Series should be used. This includes the case of variability analysis at different levels: interannual, monthly, or sub-hourly.

In practice, when the simulator’s data handling capacity is limited, we can consider Time Series as the “raw material” to create secondary data products if needed. That means that if someone still wants to use “chunks” of a one-year period for energy simulations, they can easily be extracted from the original Time Series and identify those that were particularly extreme in terms of highest or lowest solar irradiance (or any other meteorological parameter with influence in PV system design and performance).

TMY TS Max Min

Figure 4. Time series monthly values provide minimum and maximum monthly values besides monthly averages

 

TMY TS profiles

Figure 5. Time series allows the calculation of other statistics e.g. P90, P99, etc.

 

Conclusions

While TMY datasets could still be useful when fast comparisons are required (usually at the first stages of the project), Time Series datasets are required for doing a technical and financial analysis of a PV power plant.
The most relevant differences between both datasets are summarized in the tables below.

 

TMY TS features

Figure 6. Comparison of Time Series and TMY data features

 

TMY TS applications

 Figure 7. Comparison of Time Series and TMY data applications 

 

Download sample Time Series here (CSV) and sample TMY file here (CSV).

Keep reading

Why to use satellite-based solar resource data in PV performance assessment
Best practices

Why to use satellite-based solar resource data in PV performance assessment

It is widely accepted that high-standard pyranometers operated under rigorously controlled conditions are to be used for bankable performance assessment of photovoltaic (PV) power systems.

How Solargis is improving accuracy of solar power forecasts
Best practices

How Solargis is improving accuracy of solar power forecasts

Just as there are horses for courses, different forecasting techniques are more suitable depending on the intended forecast lead time.

How to calculate P90 (or other Pxx) PV energy yield estimates
Best practices

How to calculate P90 (or other Pxx) PV energy yield estimates

To assess the solar resource or energy yield potential of a site, we model the solar resource/energy yield using best available information and methods. The resulting estimate is the P50 estimate, or in other words, the “best estimate”. P50 is essentially a statistical level of confidence suggesting that we expect to exceed the predicted solar resource/energy yield 50% of the time. However, ...